|
The
Aftermath
by Thomas P. Sweetser
In the Aftermath, America, October 28, 2002, Thomas P.
Sweetser, S.J. tells us "The People are catching on that they are
the church." His insightful analysis of the awakening and his prescription
for change will surely reassure the Voice of the Faithful, that we are
on the right track.
Sweetser sees a parallel between the great awakening that
overwhelmed and amazed Peter in the house of Cornelius, leading to the
welcoming of the gentile, with the upheaval that now confronts the church
as a consequence of the sex abuse scandals.
In Sweetser's words:
"The same phenomenon is happening in the church today.
Those in authority might consider the present upheaval to be a bad dream.
In many ways it is, especially for those who are survivors of clergy sexual
abuse. It is also a knock at the door, an invitation to change the way
the church operates. Ordinary and common people are experiencing a new
vision of church, one that challenges a small cadre of decision-makers
unaccountable for their actions."
"As has happened in many parts of the country,
the Archdiocese of Milwaukee held "listening sessions" for those who wanted
to be heard. The one I attended was in a parish hall packed with faith-filled
Catholics who were also angry, concerned and very vocal. They were knocking
at the door of the hierarchical structure demanding accountability and
reform. Theirs was a united voice of both traditional and progressive
persuasions that demanded redress for wrongs and coverups. Their voices
also called for a leadership that would include both married and single
people, male and female. The church is undergoing a shift in awareness
and vision not unlike that experienced by Peter, the first pope. It can
no longer be contained within limited boundaries and narrow ways of acting."
In this new climate, "trust is no longer freely given".
And the ".days in which people accepted the word of a bishop or pastor
without question are over. Perhaps this is the most profound consequence
of a shift in attitudes. The laity want change, and they want to participate
in what those changes will be."
The author sees hopeful signs in the convening of diverse
abuse-review committees of laymen and women vested with " .authority
and credibility, power and prestige-a new phenomenon for governance in
the church." Increasingly collaborative roles on the Parish level
also reflect this profound change.
Father Sweetser, who is a recognized expert in the structure
and governance of pastoral councils, notes that:
The more successful pastoral councils have operated as
joint efforts of leaders and pastor together. Pastors give authority to
the councils to participate in the decision-making of the parish. This
may serve well as a model for change in church structures as a whole.
Cautioning that the regaining of trust and confidence
will "take some doing", Father Sweetser concludes that:
"Converting a parish to a more consultative
and inclusive style of governance must be genuine and not merely rhetorical.
The days in which people accepted the word of a bishop or pastor without
question are over. Perhaps this is the most profound consequence of a
shift in attitudes. The laity want change, and they want to participate
in what those changes will be."
***
"To regain the trust and confidence of the laity,
diocesan structures will have to become more open and accountable, with
built-in checks and balances. Advisory councils will not be enough. The
same thing must happen on the diocesan level as on the parish level, where
pastors share authority with staffs, pastoral councils and commissions.
In those dioceses where shared decision-making structures are already
in place, these must become more visible."
The author recommends a shared leadership in which visible
and qualified laity serve as co-leaders with the bishop.
"If it is true that the bishop is the one
ultimately in charge, then he has it within his power to change the system
and culture of the diocese to one of shared authority and mutual accountability."
***
"A new way of operating is demanded on the parish
level as well. The pastor was not ordained to be an administrator. His
charism is spiritual leadership. The pastor could give over the details
of running a parish to others who are trained and have enough expertise
to direct the complexities of parish life. The parish's operation could
be restructured so there are checks and balances on all levels, where
pastors and staffs are accountable to lay leaders and vice versa. A new
tradition of accountability and creative planning has to be established"
"A new way of acting is demanded of the church as
a whole. Peter had his awareness greatly expanded when he entered Cornelius's
home. The same is needed today. The view, for instance, that the church
can be run only by an all male, celibate clergy is no longer credible.
People demand change because they think, a more inclusive priesthood will
provide a larger pool of candidates and a more balanced priestly ministry.
."
Recognizing that it will probably take an ecumenical council
to implement the changes, the author concludes:
Before jumping into a worldwide conclave, however, regional
gatherings should prepare the ground. This is already happening in the
listening sessions being held in many dioceses. A groundswell is beginning.
It will not be denied. Local councils for the church in Chicago or Boston
or Atlanta could lead to an American council, which in turn would contribute
to an agenda for a world-wide ecumenical council. Change is in the air;
the Spirit is falling on all who hear the word (Acts 10:44). Unfortunate
as the recent tragic events have been, the people are catch- ing on that
they are the church. It is to be hoped that church authorities will "get
it" as well and respond appropriately.
THOMAS P. SWEETSER, S.J., is director of the Parish Evaluation
Project, Milwaukee, Wis.
Father Sweetser's Progam is described at www.pepparish.org
He can be reached at pep@pitnet.net
|